Casio Game 10

The Game 10 was one of three different games in the same/similar case from the early 1980s and shared the [165] module with the Game-20.

A similar game to the Armitron Piano Game watch, this is a horizontal shooter where you are being fired on from one of three positions and must move your ship to fire back. Points are scored based on where the incoming missile is when you hit it (you get the most points for hitting the ship before it has fired).

Given how little space there is for the game, it’s surprisingly playable. The idea must have appealed to the Casio designers too, because the follow-up game (Game-30/301) was essentially the same thing but switched around to a vertical shooter with a submarine theme.

The third game of the series (Game-40/401) was very different.

There’s also the usual time/date/stopwatch too and, best of all for adults who didn’t necessarily want to be seen to be wearing a kids watch, it didn’t look like a game watch (no fancy colours or front buttons).

Prices have skyrocketed in recent years so if you find one of these watches, consider it a good investment.

If you have found a spelling error, please, notify us by selecting that text and pressing Ctrl+Enter.

You may also like:


Posted

in

, ,

by

Tags:

Comments

4 responses to “Casio Game 10”

  1. Bruce Avatar
    Bruce

    I recently bought the casio mg880 from you, so great to have one after so many years. Do you have any game watches like above for sale, or even other game calculators?

    1. liquid Avatar

      Hi, I’ll See what I’ve got available for sale at the moment / don’t currently have a Game-10 (they’re a bit overpriced for what they are to be honest) but have a few interesting games for sale.

  2. Wendell Avatar
    Wendell

    Is this for sale?

    1. liquid Avatar

      Sorry – this is not currently for sale 🙂

Leave a Reply to liquid Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Liquid Crystal

Spelling error report

The following text will be sent to our editors: